Technology and Construction Court
Coventry & Warwickshire Development Partnership LLP v Avison Young (UK) Ltd
[2026] EWHC 2319 (TCC)
Adjudication: an alternative to either expert’s valuation
Cases shaping expert evidence and practice. Explore Academy commentary, the issues that matter and lessons for experts.
Search cases
132 cases
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
Tayhopon v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2026] UKAITUR UI2025004978
Expert instructions and access to medical records
Commercial Court
Nord Stream AG v Lloyd’s Insurance Company S.A. & Anor
[2026] EWHC 1685 (Comm)
Independence must be visible in the reasoning
Court of Appeal of Northern Ireland
The King v ZX
[2025] NICA 76
How often do you see an expert witness themself become part of the reason a criminal conviction is overturned? That is, in effect, what happened in The King v ZX [2025] NICA 76, a decision of the Court of Appeal…
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
JBX v Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust
[2026] EWHC 2294 (KB)
An expert may have sound reasons for favouring a particular answer. But explaining those reasons is only part of the task. Where there are competing opinions, the report also needs to show that they have been considered fairly, including the…
First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
KS v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
An expert is perfectly entitled to reach a strong opinion which supports the case of the party instructing them. The difficulty is when the reasoning appears to work the other way round, with the party’s case driving the expert opinion.…
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
SU (Expert reports – format) Bangladesh
[2026] UKUT 317 (IAC)
A recent Upper Tribunal decision gives some unusually practical guidance for experts who rely on material found online. In SU (Expert reports – format) Bangladesh [2026] UKUT 317 (IAC) , the Tribunal considered expert reports which drew heavily on publicly…
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
Various Claimants v Mercedes-Benz Group AG and others
[2026] EWHC 1753 (KB)
The High Court’s judgment in Various Claimants v Mercedes-Benz Group AG and others [2026] EWHC 1753 (KB) is a useful reminder that technical expertise, however impressive, is only part of the job of an expert witness. The litigation involved a…
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
MSA Properties Limited v The Drapery Northampton Ltd
[2026] EWHC 1420 (KB)
A High Court decision provides a useful warning for professionals who become expert witnesses in matters in which they have already been involved. In MSA Properties Ltd v The Drapery Northampton Ltd [2026] EWHC 1420 (KB) , the court had…
High Court (Chancery Division)
Trinsic Collagen Limited v Procoll Limited
[2026] EWHC 1793 (Ch)
In Trinsic Collagen Ltd v Procoll Ltd [2026] EWHC 1793 (Ch), the court criticised the way additional information had been provided to the claimant’s experts and then relied on without being clearly identified in the reports, or in one instance…
Administrative Court
Dr Michael Mew v The General Dental Council
[2026] EWHC 1116 (Admin)
Not later. In the report. If an expert opinion depends on incomplete data, assumptions or qualifications, those limitations belong in the written report. Not in cross-examination. Not in re-examination. Not only after the tribunal asks the right question. In Mew…
Family Court
X and Y (Care Proceedings: Fact Finding: Death of a Child: Expert Evidence), Re
[2025] EWFC 132
Academy commentary on Re X and Y (Care Proceedings: Fact Finding: Death of a Child: Expert Evidence), discussed in ““The expert had only skimmed the papers.””.