Court of Session
Glenfiddich Wind Ltd v Dorenell Windfarm Ltd
[2025] CSOH 62
Academy commentary on Glenfiddich Wind Ltd v Dorenell Windfarm Ltd, discussed in “Expert overload. Is there such a thing as too much expert evidence?”.
Cases shaping expert evidence and practice. Explore Academy commentary, the issues that matter and lessons for experts.
Search cases
132 cases
High Court (Chancery Division)
JSC Commercial Bank Privatbank v Igor Valeryevich Kolomoisky & Ors
[2025] EWHC 1987 (Ch)
There has been some publicity about a recent case, JSC Privatbank v Kolomoisky , in which past judicial criticism of an expert were raised, suggesting among other things that experts have a duty to disclose such criticism. Less attention has…
Crown Court of Northern Ireland
The King v Damian Duffy and Shea Reynolds
[2025] NICC 17
Academy commentary on The King v Damian Duffy and Shea Reynolds, discussed in “Computer says no? Expert knowledge on inputs and outputs from computer models remains vital”.
Technology and Construction Court
Patricia Andrews & Ors v Kronospan Limited
[2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC)
Ignoring AI for the moment, the use of computer models of various kinds has become routine in most if not all professions, whether it’s a simple spreadsheet or a sophisticated engineering in model. It should be no surprise then when…
High Court (Chancery Division)
Lidl Great Britain Limited & Anor v Tesco Stores Limited & Anor
[2023] EWHC 873 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Lidl v Tesco, discussed in “Evidence goes public. Why experts should take care to be consistent in their opinions.”.
High Court (Chancery Division)
Abbott Diabetes Care Inc v Sinocare Inc & Ors
[2025] EWHC 206 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Abbott Diabetes Care v Sinocare, discussed in “Evidence goes public. Why experts should take care to be consistent in their opinions.”.
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
DHV (A Protected Party through his Litigation Friend WTX) v Motor Insurers’ Bureau
[2025] EWHC 2002 (KB)
Insights into expert practice in different jurisdictions can be very helpful, not least because they often show that there are good and bad experts everywhere. DHV v Motor Insurers’ Bureau was an unusual case about the compensation due to a…
Court of Session
Ruby Properties v James Alistair Watt
[2025] CSOH 61
Academy commentary on Ruby Properties v James Alistair Watt, discussed in “Facts or factoids? Experts need to beware facts that don’t add up.”.
Technology and Construction Court
Toppan Holdings Limited & Anor v Augusta 2008 LLP
[2025] EWHC 1691 (TCC)
Academy commentary on Toppan Holdings Ltd & Anor v Augusta 2008 LLP, discussed in “Facts or factoids? Experts need to beware facts that don’t add up.”.
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
Andrew Cannestra v Mclaren Automotive Events Limited
[2025] EWHC 1844 (KB)
A recent case about a snowmobile accident ( Cannestra v McLaren Automotive Events ) has been much commented on because the Claimant seems to have constructed a version of events somewhat at odds with his comments at the time that…
Court of Appeal
LZLabs Gmbh & Ors v IBM UK Limited
[2025] EWCA Civ 842
Academy commentary on IBM United Kingdom Ltd v LzLabs GmbH, discussed in “Schadenfreude? The natural expert response to judges being criticised for getting expert evidence wrong.”.
Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
Monier Road Limited v Nicholas Alexander Blomfield & Ors
[2025] UKUT 157 (LC)
Academy commentary on Monier Road Ltd v Blomfield, discussed in “Schadenfreude? The natural expert response to judges being criticised for getting expert evidence wrong.”.