Log in to your account
Search the Academy Website
Administrative Court
[2026] EWHC 1116 (Admin)
Not later. In the report. If an expert opinion depends on incomplete data, assumptions or qualifications, those limitations belong in the written report. Not in cross-examination. Not in re-examination. Not only after the tribunal asks the right question. In Mew…
Court of Appeal
[2025] EWCA Civ 842
Academy commentary on IBM United Kingdom Ltd v LzLabs GmbH, discussed in “Schadenfreude? The natural expert response to judges being criticised for getting expert evidence wrong.”.
Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
[2025] UKUT 157 (LC)
Academy commentary on Monier Road Ltd v Blomfield, discussed in “Schadenfreude? The natural expert response to judges being criticised for getting expert evidence wrong.”.
Family Court
[2025] EWFC 100
Experts who work in the sectors where most clients are funded by Legal Aid, notably the Family and Criminal courts, will know that the Legal Aid Authority (LAA) operates strict controls over the fees payable to experts. Their guidance on…
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 349 (Ch)
Litigation deadlines are unforgiving and a common gripe among experts is being given instructions too late, with not enough time to do the job properly. The difficulty of course is that we all want to help our client and instructing…
Technology and Construction Court
[2012] EWHC 2904 (TCC)
How to refuse to mediate reasonably
Court of Appeal
[2012] EWCA Civ 392
Another Expert changes his mind - The effect on the party
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
[2011] EWHC 3980 (QB)
Necessity for Expert Evidence, late application & £1 million fees
Court of Appeal
[2012] EWCA Civ 54
SJE acting beyond Instructions
Court of Appeal
[2011] EWCA Civ 1325
Experts fees - Statute Barred
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)
[2006] EWHC 1478 (QB)
Relevance of Expert Evidence to Limitation
High Court (Chancery Division)
Reported in Lawtel (2005)
The fascinating case of a without prejudice threat
