Log in to your account
Search the Academy Website
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 206 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Abbott Diabetes Care v Sinocare, discussed in “Evidence goes public. Why experts should take care to be consistent in their opinions.”.
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
[2025] EWHC 2002 (KB)
Insights into expert practice in different jurisdictions can be very helpful, not least because they often show that there are good and bad experts everywhere. DHV v Motor Insurers’ Bureau was an unusual case about the compensation due to a…
Court of Session
[2025] CSOH 61
Academy commentary on Ruby Properties v James Alistair Watt, discussed in “Facts or factoids? Experts need to beware facts that don’t add up.”.
Technology and Construction Court
[2025] EWHC 1691 (TCC)
Academy commentary on Toppan Holdings Ltd & Anor v Augusta 2008 LLP, discussed in “Facts or factoids? Experts need to beware facts that don’t add up.”.
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
[2025] EWHC 1844 (KB)
A recent case about a snowmobile accident ( Cannestra v McLaren Automotive Events ) has been much commented on because the Claimant seems to have constructed a version of events somewhat at odds with his comments at the time that…
Court of Appeal
[2025] EWCA Civ 842
Academy commentary on IBM United Kingdom Ltd v LzLabs GmbH, discussed in “Schadenfreude? The natural expert response to judges being criticised for getting expert evidence wrong.”.
Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
[2025] UKUT 157 (LC)
Academy commentary on Monier Road Ltd v Blomfield, discussed in “Schadenfreude? The natural expert response to judges being criticised for getting expert evidence wrong.”.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 752 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Nicholas & Ors v Thomas & Anor, discussed in “Ducks (or Falcons) in a row – the importance of lawyers raising expert evidence at the right time”.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 1159 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Huang and Wang v Credit Suisse, discussed in “Ducks (or Falcons) in a row – the importance of lawyers raising expert evidence at the right time”.
High Court of Ireland
[2025] IEHC 193
Academy commentary on Lynch v Murphy, discussed in “Ducks (or Falcons) in a row – the importance of lawyers raising expert evidence at the right time”.
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
[2025] EWHC 1261 (KB)
Academy commentary on Philipa Hodgson v Dr Daniel Hammond & Anor, discussed in “Hired gun? How to avoid being seen as an advocate for your client.”.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 1031 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Skykomish Ltd v Gerald Eve LLP, discussed in “Hired gun? How to avoid being seen as an advocate for your client.”.
