High Court (Chancery Division)
Michael Ashley & Anor v Tony Michael Jimenez
[2025] EWHC 557 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Michael Ashley & Anor v Tony Michael Jimenez, discussed in “Expert or not expert? Spot the difference?”.
Log in to your account
Search the Academy Website
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 557 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Michael Ashley & Anor v Tony Michael Jimenez, discussed in “Expert or not expert? Spot the difference?”.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 878 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Freeman & Ors v Home Farm (Ellingham) Ltd, discussed in “It was this big, really! Exaggeration has no place in expert evidence.”.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 349 (Ch)
Litigation deadlines are unforgiving and a common gripe among experts is being given instructions too late, with not enough time to do the job properly. The difficulty of course is that we all want to help our client and instructing…
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 221 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Jukic v BBC & Anor, discussed in “Goldilocks expert reports? How to make your report just right.”.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2024] EWHC 3285 (Ch)
Too bullish to ignore an expert? A cautionary tale from a costs hearing that clients ignore expert’s opinions at their peril. This was a fairly common story in the IT world, the claimant tried to sell some software to the…
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2013] EWHC 599 (Ch)
Academy commentary on an inexperienced expert, the preparation provided by the legal team and the importance of understanding the duty to the court.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2011] EWHC 2226 (Ch)
Interpretation of a clause - is it Arbitration or Expert Determination?
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2011] EWHC 474 (Ch)
The independence of an Expert
High Court (Chancery Division)
Reported in Lawtel (2005)
The fascinating case of a without prejudice threat
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2007] EWHC 2245 (Ch)
The Employed Expert and how to Overcome a Lack of Independence
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2008] EWHC 185 (Ch)
Interpretation of documents is the judge’s job