Commercial Court
Nord Stream AG v Lloyd’s Insurance Company S.A. & Anor
[2026] EWHC 1685 (Comm)
Independence must be visible in the reasoning
Log in to your account
Search the Academy Website
Commercial Court
[2026] EWHC 1685 (Comm)
Independence must be visible in the reasoning
Commercial Court
[2025] EWHC 2364 (Comm)
The High Court ruling against Danish tax authority SKAT in a £1.4 billion dividend tax fraud case has been widely reported, not least because the judge concluded that SKAT’s controls on the transactions involved were so flimsy as to represent…
Commercial Court
[2025] EWHC 1586 (Comm)
Academy commentary on Energygen and Hyundai v HD Korea Shipbuilding, discussed in “Expert overload. Is there such a thing as too much expert evidence?”.
Commercial Court
[2025] EWHC 1090 (Comm)
When highly qualified experts can sometimes get things very wrong you might be forgiven for thinking that the answer is yet more study and training. An in the well known case of a carbon trading expert in 2019 who “couldn’t…
Commercial Court
[2024] EWHC 2728 (Comm)
Grasping the Nettle? For a change not a case that turns on an expert’s performance but a rather dry hearing about a Claimant’s request for summary judgment on whether the Defendant could relay on the original contract or were stuck…
Commercial Court
[2011] EWHC 2422 (Comm)
The experience of an Expert
Commercial Court
[2011] EWHC 268 (Comm)
Privilege and Expert reports