Sheriff Appeal Court
Tracey McGill v RM Property and Facilities Solutions Limited
[2025] SAC (Civ) 7
Academy commentary on Tracey McGill v RM Property and Facilities Solutions Limited, discussed in “Expert or not expert? Spot the difference?”.
Log in to your account
Search the Academy Website
Sheriff Appeal Court
[2025] SAC (Civ) 7
Academy commentary on Tracey McGill v RM Property and Facilities Solutions Limited, discussed in “Expert or not expert? Spot the difference?”.
Court of Appeal
[2025] EWCA Civ 177
Academy commentary on Sarah Jane Young v John Anthony Downey, discussed in “Expert or not expert? Spot the difference?”.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 526 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Malcolm Cohen & Ors v Co-operative Group Limited & Ors, discussed in “Expert or not expert? Spot the difference?”.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 557 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Michael Ashley & Anor v Tony Michael Jimenez, discussed in “Expert or not expert? Spot the difference?”.
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
[2025] EWHC 869 (KB)
Academy commentary on Rajan Marwaha v Director of Border Revenue & Anor, discussed in “Expert or not expert? Spot the difference?”.
Patents Court
[2025] EWHC 539 (Pat)
Only common sense? Now may not be the best time to refer to Thomas Paine’s advice to Americans that they should seek independence from Britain, but a keen understanding of what common sense means is important for an expert. It’s…
To kick off 2025 we’re starting a new series of posts about terms and expression used by lawyers that can leave the new expert rather baffled. You may well hear references to the Ikarian Reefer bandied around and wonder what…
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2013] EWHC 599 (Ch)
Academy commentary on an inexperienced expert, the preparation provided by the legal team and the importance of understanding the duty to the court.
High Court of Singapore
[2012] SGHC 135
How not to give Expert evidence. Academy commentary on examples of experts failing to approach their duties to the tribunal properly.
Court of Session (Outer House)
[2012] CSOH 001
Ergonomics — an uncomfortable seat in the box. Academy commentary on judicial observations about the quality of expert evidence.
High Court (Technology and Construction Court)
[2011] EWHC 1936 (TCC)
Behaviour of Experts. Academy commentary on expert meetings, joint statements, testing and the importance of focusing on the issues before the court.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2011] EWHC 474 (Ch)
The independence of an Expert