Log in to your account
Search the Academy Website
Cases shaping expert evidence and practice. Explore Academy commentary, the issues that matter and lessons for experts.
Commercial Court
[2025] EWHC 1586 (Comm)
Academy commentary on Energygen and Hyundai v HD Korea Shipbuilding, discussed in “Expert overload. Is there such a thing as too much expert evidence?”.
Court of Session
[2025] CSOH 62
Academy commentary on Glenfiddich Wind Ltd v Dorenell Windfarm Ltd, discussed in “Expert overload. Is there such a thing as too much expert evidence?”.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 1987 (Ch)
There has been some publicity about a recent case, JSC Privatbank v Kolomoisky , in which past judicial criticism of an expert were raised, suggesting among other things that experts have a duty to disclose such criticism. Less attention has…
Crown Court of Northern Ireland
[2025] NICC 17
Academy commentary on The King v Damian Duffy and Shea Reynolds, discussed in “Computer says no? Expert knowledge on inputs and outputs from computer models remains vital”.
Technology and Construction Court
[2025] EWHC 2429 (TCC)
Ignoring AI for the moment, the use of computer models of various kinds has become routine in most if not all professions, whether it’s a simple spreadsheet or a sophisticated engineering in model. It should be no surprise then when…
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2023] EWHC 873 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Lidl v Tesco, discussed in “Evidence goes public. Why experts should take care to be consistent in their opinions.”.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 206 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Abbott Diabetes Care v Sinocare, discussed in “Evidence goes public. Why experts should take care to be consistent in their opinions.”.
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
[2025] EWHC 2002 (KB)
Insights into expert practice in different jurisdictions can be very helpful, not least because they often show that there are good and bad experts everywhere. DHV v Motor Insurers’ Bureau was an unusual case about the compensation due to a…
Court of Session
[2025] CSOH 61
Academy commentary on Ruby Properties v James Alistair Watt, discussed in “Facts or factoids? Experts need to beware facts that don’t add up.”.
Technology and Construction Court
[2025] EWHC 1691 (TCC)
Academy commentary on Toppan Holdings Ltd & Anor v Augusta 2008 LLP, discussed in “Facts or factoids? Experts need to beware facts that don’t add up.”.
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
[2025] EWHC 1844 (KB)
A recent case about a snowmobile accident ( Cannestra v McLaren Automotive Events ) has been much commented on because the Claimant seems to have constructed a version of events somewhat at odds with his comments at the time that…
Court of Appeal
[2025] EWCA Civ 842
Academy commentary on IBM United Kingdom Ltd v LzLabs GmbH, discussed in “Schadenfreude? The natural expert response to judges being criticised for getting expert evidence wrong.”.
