Log in to your account
Search the Academy Website
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 206 (Ch)
Academy commentary on Abbott Diabetes Care v Sinocare, discussed in “Evidence goes public. Why experts should take care to be consistent in their opinions.”.
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
[2025] EWHC 2002 (KB)
Insights into expert practice in different jurisdictions can be very helpful, not least because they often show that there are good and bad experts everywhere. DHV v Motor Insurers’ Bureau was an unusual case about the compensation due to a…
Technology and Construction Court
[2025] EWHC 1691 (TCC)
A valuation report lacked supporting facts and failed to address the defects in issue.
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
[2025] EWHC 1844 (KB)
A recent case about a snowmobile accident ( Cannestra v McLaren Automotive Events ) has been much commented on because the Claimant seems to have constructed a version of events somewhat at odds with his comments at the time that…
Court of Appeal
[2025] EWCA Civ 842
The Court of Appeal declined to unpick closely connected factual and expert findings.
Family Court
[2025] EWFC 100
Experts who work in the sectors where most clients are funded by Legal Aid, notably the Family and Criminal courts, will know that the Legal Aid Authority (LAA) operates strict controls over the fees payable to experts. Their guidance on…
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 752 (Ch)
A supplementary expert report responded to material served shortly before trial.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 1159 (Ch)
The absence of handwriting evidence weakened an application for summary judgment.
High Court (King’s Bench Division)
[2025] EWHC 1261 (KB)
The expert maintained an opinion after its assumed factual basis had been undermined.
High Court (Chancery Division)
[2025] EWHC 1031 (Ch)
An independent valuation expert dealt effectively with new material in cross-examination.
Technology and Construction Court
[2024] EWHC 1185 (TCC)
The same critical standard should be applied to both parties’ quantum cases.
Commercial Court
[2025] EWHC 1090 (Comm)
When highly qualified experts can sometimes get things very wrong you might be forgiven for thinking that the answer is yet more study and training. An in the well known case of a carbon trading expert in 2019 who “couldn’t…
