Angel Water or Snake Oil? Anyone starting a new venture needs confidence in their product so it’s hardly surprising when entrepreneurs wax lyrical and sometimes over-state the importance of their inventions. But experts acting in disputes involving new technology need to beware the dangers of not fully investigating their client’s claims.
In a recent case in Abu Dhabi the claimant, the supposed inventor of a method of creating ‘Angel Water’ was said to be someone “whose self-regard is at times reflected in hyperbole and exaggeration”. He was apparently unable to explain with any clarity how the invention worked and when pressed was not willing to give the court any meaningful details of his ‘trade secrets’.
The claimant’s expert “did not get off to a promising start” as he admitted to an ongoing commercial relationship with the claimant which “served immediately to cloud any perception of independent evaluative evidence, or that he had approached this case with an open mind“. That appears to have been compounded by attempts to convince the court that electrolysis of water would produce a special, flammable “HYDROGAS”, which was “water vapour” but not “steam”.
Those of you who were awake during GCSE Chemistry lessons, as both judge and opposing counsel clearly were, will know that water vapour doesn’t burn and the electrolysis of water produces a mixture of hydrogen and oxygen, which does. But sadly for the Claimant the latter is a well-known fact and not a new invention. All of which leads to the inexorable conclusion that the expert involved was either very much not an expert or very much not independent!
Whichever position is correct the answer the court came to was that the Claimant was selling snake oil and should recompense the Defendant for money they had been persuaded to invest!
Our picture is from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/how-snake-oil-became-a-symbol-of-fraud-and-deception-180985300/ and an article about how Snake Oil became a symbol of fraud.